Your Comments Here
Here a few brainscraps of the latest carnivalesque thinking at Rotund Towers. Peruse the following, and if you are so moved, use the comments form at the bottom of the page by clicking on the words YOU SAY at the end of each entry. We believe that there is a mysterious and prolonged process involved before your comments appear here, if they ever do. In any event, kindly place a capital letter at the beginning of your remarks which corresponds to the entry you’re referring to. No anonymous comments will be posted, or even read. If you want to remain anonymous to our readers, please indicate how you wish to sign your comments. Confidentiality guaranteed. Gracias.
A. COMMENTS: Whenever we hear an evangelist proclaim, “Good news!” we run for cover and make sure our wallet's still in our pockets. Whew! But friends, that’s exactly, Eggs Ackley, what we have for you today. At long, long last, after enduring endless sneers and imprecations from our friends and other “people in the know,” we have decided to add a comments capability to our otherwise spiffy enterprise. “How very bloggish of you,” many will probably say, and not kindly, but to tell the truth the damn things probably don’t work at this point, and even if they do we’re only guaranteeing that the system is half-assed at best. In Puerto Rico we call it “the twenty-nine percent factor,” meaning that’s about all you can hope for.
We’re starting out small, with two or three opportunities to blast away. Have your say and wait for awhile and maybe your snarking or carping or bald flattery will show up below and maybe it won’t. Give us a chance. We’re simple twentieth century folk stuck in the largely incomprehensible hugger-mugger of the twenty-first century.
B. EL MUSEO DE ARTE CONTEMPORANEO: In the little more than two years we’ve been in Puerto Rico, el Museo de Arte Contemporáneo has always seemed the barefoot jibaro among island art museums, more of a dutiful caretaker of the few works it’s cadged from local artists than a venerated picture palace, like el Museo de Arte de Ponce, or the bringer of someone’s family jewels, as el Museo de Arte de Puerto Rico often is.
But it happens that some of the most memorable exhibitions we’ve seen during our brief sojourn we’ve enjoyed in MAC’s homey, always cool salas de exhibición. We came upon great work by Rigoberto Quintana there, an installation of school desks with the artist’s masterful chaos inscribed on them like so much student bad behavior. Jeannette Betancourt showed over two dozen of her leather and steel contraption-reliquaries in a remarkable exhibition titled Sentidos alternos in 2005, and it was at MAC that we first beheld Carmelo Fontanés’s conceptual sideshows-in-a box, featuring sculpted No. 2 pencils and veritable snowdrifts of graphite. The prolific ceramics sculptor Toni Hambleton had a retrospective of large and small works at MAC, generously curated by Museo de Arte de Ponce director Agustín Arteaga, and last year’s Lexus competition winners—Héctor Madera González, Quintín Rivera Toro, and Carlos Ruíz Valarino—provided a varied and largely satisfying display of what’s buzzing around the noggins of modern-day Puerto Rican youth.
Since the arrival of Brenda Torres Figueroa as the museum’s curator, even exhibitions drawn from the modest permanent collection have been sleek and smart, and have given the museum’s holdings an unaccustomed polish. Torres Figueroa is definitely dressing the place up.
El Museo de Arte Contemporáneo has never looked as dressy as it does right now, at least not to us, with a couple of very good exhibitions organized by the curator and another Lexus winners show that, at least in part, does not embarrass the institution. Restos, which conceives of art making as imaginative archeology, is a two-part exhibition, one section derived from the permanent collection and the other drawn largely from a local private collection and focusing on contemporary Cuban artists. Its title is, not surprisingly, Desembarco.
Whatever you think of the museum’s permanent collection, Torres Figueroa has given it a distinctive shape on this occasion, and, as usual, some of the unintended consequences are as intriguing as the somewhat academic purposes she had in mind. First of all, there are certain artists we think we’ll never tire of. We’re happy to see José Rosa—our fave printmaker who’s no longer making prints—anywhere, whether it’s in a vast horse-themed conglomeration or La Muestra Nacional. Rosa’s contribution to the exhibition is unusually sumptuous in a material way, featuring characters of a satiny black complexion cavorting —it’s Rosa, what else?—in a kind of disco-era Christo-Egyptian-themed masque. Perhaps if you know Don Luis you understand the deeper secrets of this apparently ritualistic imbroglio, but there is no mistaking its sensual, startlingly erotic vigor and the supple beauties of its surfaces.
Any chance to visit the grid-like puzzle pieces of Nayda Collazo-Llorens is likewise a pleasure, and her work in Restos, Evidencia, is a doozy; a quadrangular hanging of five hundred little ziplock packets, each with detritus gathered from Puerto Rican beaches: broken glass, pebbles, what we can only assume is seaweed. As usual, the work evinces a conceptual dimension which is interesting enough, but it begins to dazzle only with close inspection and the cumulative effect of the artist’s obsessive categorization.
But what a conservation nightmare. As you can see, the markings on some of the packets —could that be Magic Marker?—are suffering the depredations of time and storage. The work was made in 1999 and consists of plastic, a CD—which presumably holds the minutae Collazo-Llorens recorded—and “gathered material.”
When you know an artist in a certain way—and we’ve only been following Collazo-Llorens’s work for the past couple of years—it’s likewise revealing to view something from the more distant past. Much of MAC’s collection, as seen in this exhibition, seems to have been acquired just before and after the turn of the century—the most recent turn, that is—and looking back even five to ten years gives us a new perspective on what we thought we knew.
This brings us to an issue which Restos seems to have largely skirted. Perhaps it’s too obvious. Speaking of creative archeology, artists necessarily mine their own trajectories as well as their times and places, and we often ask ourselves if art making isn’t largely formal groping about, one damn thing leading to another. (A corollary being, of course, that art-critical head-scratching is pretty much beside the point, a pet theory of ours but one we’ll spare our readers for now.) What about our pal Victor Vázquez? Vázquez’s mixed media El bodegón de Yemayá works over themes of suffering and mortification we’ve become accustomed to seeing in the artist’s overall project, but we were struck by something else in the context of Restos. It is a solidly built thing, and its structure mellows its discomfiting rawness—a little anyway—and makes it look downright painterly, almost like a traditional museum artifact. Maybe you have to squint to see it. In any event, what was Victor thinking? Spiritual travail, or getting the thing to look just so, a shade or two different from the last one? An arcane, even picayune line of inquiry, perhaps, but one that seems logical for an exhibition like Restos.
Let’s see, we were speaking of unintended consequences, and artists we always love to see. Then there are the ones we’ve either heard of or haven’t, but whom we should have known very well by now. We’ve caught glimpses of videos by Beatriz Santiago Muñoz, but her Archivo, from 2001, is a highly opportune, omnibus encounter with her video- making approach. She employs ordinary people in, while not exactly extraordinary situations—in one brief rural semi-idyll, we watch and wait with a group of would-be passengers as they complain about a long-overdue train—mostly antic inventions which any unself-conscious Puerto Rican would be happy to indulge in: reenactments of the shooting of the legendary outlaw Toño Bicicleta by a grocer wielding a banana and fun-loving little boys on bikes, or willing amateur thespians who chalk lines on a sidewalk and pretend to be aerialist Karl Wallenda falling to his death in 1978 while trying to navigate a high wire between two hotels in Condado. Hilarious. Real, slightly notorious Puerto Rican history given the populist treatment it deserves.
Speaking of populism and those who aspire to it, Tania N. Frontera—quite possibly not her real name—presents in Restos a series of wanted posters seeking various “cultural outlaws,” such as the preposterously starchy Isabel la Espanola. In each of five prints we see the artist in various thin disguises, employing a kind of cheap-seats version of the identity politics that Adal Maldonado likes to baroquely flog.
But Frontera reaches for a cheesiness that Maldonado wouldn’t dare, and so the posters never get puffed up with their own importance which, when you have to swallow a whole lot of it at once, can make the hectoring tone not so tasty after awhile.
But for uncomplicated handsomeness, we found Jaime Romero’s El pergamino de los insolentes just about unbeatable, a seeming wall of waxy parchment that time has scumbled and broken through, revealing the murky, hive-like subsurface behind the façade of things. In spite of the work’s mundane ingredients, its invented ravages almost reek of musk and honey. Two tiny figures with canes face each other across the unbridgeable distance of a metal rod, in the shadow of what must seem to them an immensity of history and circumstance, though to us it’s just a small box on a wall. If this is not about insolentes suffering for their hubris, we certainly wish it was.
C. LEXUS HUBRIS: Speaking of hubris, we’re wondering what, exactly, the problem with the Lexus awards is. One year a pretty good crop, the next year barely a squeak of proficiency. Like many people—take the estimable Pedro Vélez in artnet, please—we’re rooting for Karlo Ibarra. There is one cornball joke in his installation Each City Can Be Another, and a clutch of good little paintings. At least Ibarra makes an argument and holds it up to various lights. There are the sports shoes high on the wall, as if dangling from utility lines as they do every city in the world. Ibarra shows us jars of filth, sort of like Collazo-Llorens does with her beach matter, although unlike Collazo-Llorens and her mania for orderliness, you can almost smell the stink of this unseemly collection.
A wall painted with a boilerplate grid of streets, called Mapa Zonográfico, is perhaps the centerpiece of the installation, featuring anonymous snapshots of not much, diminutive picture cards of obscure tourist landmarks, and small paintings showing street signs with place names against hazy late-day skies. We bet that Ibarra is talking about our thoroughly globalized world, one place being as good, or as bad, as another, but his argument is not the baleful cliché we’ve gotten our bellies full of lately.
Ibarra asserts himself as an artist; he personalizes even as the thing he assays is all formula and fake regionalizing; he paints by hand, as landscape painters did and do, the intersection of Cuba Street with Caracas Street, indicating by other means that this place is probably far from either Venezuela or La Habana, or it’s in one place or the other but it hardly matters anymore. That he’s telling us this with patience and good humor indicates it isn’t getting him down, yet, and that’s a message fortunately out of step with the prevailing sourpuss mode.
Each City Can Be Another is a nice blend of restrained aesthetic and nuanced tone, and Ibarra seems to possess enough flinty will—or perhaps he’s just an easy-going guy with solid, developing talent—to get our admiring attention.
D. THE CUBANS: What we admire most at MAC at the moment, however, y por mucho, as they say, is that second part of Restos, Desembarco, an entire sala of contemporary Cuban artists, mostly from the fabled wild-child generation that dragged Cuba onto the world stage during the turbulent 1980s and 90s. There is work by José Bedia, Juan Francisco Elso, Ana Mendieta, Armando Mariño, Los Carpinteros, Kcho, and a video by Tania Bruguera by way of which you quickly understand why Bruguera has such a fearsome reputation. This selection of works is a different animal: imposingly restless yet stately, daring in its heyday and still possessed of considerable strength. Bedia’s box is a jewel, and hews to the principles of living nobly in a society of scarcity. Kcho’s spacious, iconic solo comprendo lo que pienso gets ample space in MAC’s high-ceilinged room, and it is one of the best single works in the two sections of Restos to comprehend Torres Figueroa’s notion of artist as archeologist-seer.
In the video documentation of her performances, Bruguera gets earthy, perhaps more literally than you might wish. Her art involves a lot of fluids, mud, and slaughtered goats, and in one piece she walks the streets as a spiky prehistoric beast-golem, looking for the people who’ve broken promises. We wouldn’t want to get in her path.
Museo de Arte Contemporáneo is located at the corner of Avenida Ponce de Leon and H.R. Todd in Santurce. Call 787-977-4030 for directions. The museum is open Tuesday to Saturday, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., and Sunday from noon to four. Admission is free. The web site has about as much skinny as you need.
E. UNSTOPPABLE: We think of Antonio Martorell as an admirable character in the Puerto Rican cultural landscape, the closet thing the island has to a national treasure. His new exhibition at La Ballajá, Martorell: DF—or Martorell después del fuego—is both mind-bending in its scale and achievement and ineffably sad. It represents, as the artist wants you to believe judging from his text in the exhibition catalogue, a remarkable comeback; or better said, a riposte from an artist who’s suffered an almost unimaginable reversal, the destruction of a great deal of his work and many of his collected treasures by an arson fire, an act made all the more infuriating by its origins in the malignancy of short-circuited pubescence and national malaise. (This is our interpretation of events, and not, in those words, what the text has to say.)
It is hard to imagine picking oneself up from such a blow, but Martorell is a man with a fathomless, inexorable drive to act and do what he does best, what he knows and has the considerable chops for, no matter what the situation. Even in ordinary circumstances he is an unstoppable creator, obsessive, way larger than life. What’s disappointing about his new exhibition is how much La Ballajá resembles a mausoleum, the place of a dead monarch. It seems that, his protestations notwithstanding, the fire did visit upon him an irredeemable loss. You look down one of the exhibition’s great, somber halls and there is vitrine after vitrine, as if holding the inert treasures of the long-departed. And indeed, peering into the glass, you discover evidence of a very garden-variety acquisitiveness made useless: a crushed cell phone, old cameras and door latches, folk figurines and vehicles, dolls which could only be playthings. There they sit, no longer treasures you can pull out, examine, and handle with a possessor’s satisfaction, or play with as someone dreaming of childhood, or add to like a person with that kind of itch. They are now simply blackened mummies, useless things except insofar as they represent that unspeakable insolence and the way one wrestles with fate.
Martorell expresses himself from the heart, with that years-refined, propulsive speech of his, in the preface to the exhibition; that desgracia has gracia within it, is its very root. His words are incandescent; they reach into the artist’s soul and the heart of his country. How true to the words it might have been to leave it at that for once, to let the words alone echo in a vastness filled with litte more than future possibility.
Piling desgracia upon desgracia, El Nuevo Día is trying mightily to trivialize Martorell’s tragedy by running successive days of news items, gossip page photos, contrived reviews on the heels of photo-op previews, as if undertaking a branding campaign for a new, different, and better kind of bank account, or launching a candidate headlong into the primary season. It is difficult enough anymore to differentiate advertising from what we laughingly used to call “the news hole,” but El Nuevo Día blurs the line mercilessly, shamelessly.
F. TRINITARIA EN PONCE: In faraway Ponce, that rarely perky, oft-fled place, Galería Trinitaria is doing what it can to bring some joy to Mudville. An exhibition of new paintings and drawings by Ponceño André Rodríguez Santos opened there not long ago, Compendio Medios Mixtos, and, as you see, it’s nail-polish bright and leans toward an old-fashioned and not unfriendly surrealism. The closer to abstraction these quite sizable mixed-media works are, the more inclined we are to enjoy them. The exhibition includes a few exquisitely subtle pastel drawings, of which, unfortunately, we have no images to show you.
We encourage you take the journey south, a not unpleasant drive if you don’t do it more than once in a blue moon. There are, we are not supposed to say aloud, two excellent once-in-a-lifetime exhibitions at the unnamed museum in Ponce, some French sculptor who is only one of the nineteenth century’s greatest, and an equally provocative installation of contemporary work amidst the Old World Masterpieces by the incomparable you-should- know-who. Once you pull into town, you can start off at Trinitaria and shake hands with director Felix Rivera, who is doing his best to liven things up with the help of his able administrator, Felix Garmendia Santos. Then it’s off to the museum, followed by a visit to Kings Cream and a cup of the best joe on the island, Cafe Mayor. Buen viaje.
Galería Trinitaria is located at 2980 Avenida Fagot, the phone number is 787-259-1034, and the gallery has a web site which you can access here. Whatsitsname museum is on Avenida las Américas, but we’re not saying where. Use Google to visit the web site.